Fully Modified Skyline vs Ferrari Enzo vs Mclaren F1 vs Murcielago?

On the test circuit.|||The Skyline is a true legend and no one can argue that as its a fact and not an opinion.But to be fair to the Skyline it was never made to be a Ferrari etc ,it was made as a executive class of car with a sporty look and engines to suit.


This is why a non turbo single turbo and an 2 door and a 4 door as well as an station wagon version was made,to suit each needs.


But a Skyline modded to 1000bhp or even less is a force to be reckoned with and this is the appeal to tuners IE you can buy a older Skyline and pay little for it and have 1000bhp power for little of the cost of the other cars.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8ct7WIyL鈥?/a>





1000bhp skyline review.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg2gbrCaE鈥?/a>





700 bhp R32 test.





It would be a fun race to see but as said don't underrate the cheaper car.|||It would be a toss-up between the Enzo and the McLaren F1.





Any three of the other cars would wipe the floor with the GT-R. I'm sorry, they're performance rockets, but NOT in the class of v12 supercars.





The Murcielago has the advantage of AWD, but all the major magazines have complained it isn't so much a track-day weapon as a beast for the roads. The Enzo benefits from all the 21st century technology Ferrari stuffed into it, and it's by far one of the fastest around the track.





The McLaren is an incredible car, but it loses out for lack of technology.





So I'd choose the Enzo first, the F1 second. The other two are nowhere in the game.|||Fully modified could be just about anything so unless you tell us what was done you cant compare it. It also depends on what type of track.





I'd put my money on the Enzo followed closely by the McLaren and a distant 3rd the Lambo. Its just not in the same league as the other 2 except in exotic looks.|||The Mclaren F1 will win because back then, they didn't have the restrictions on cars that they have now. The Enzo has more restrictions. Because of the government, we have to limit the engines (based on size), emissions and noise, thus making cars slower. It also depends on which circuit.





The Skyline is rubbish, even though it has 1,000 horsepower, there are cars with less horses, and are still faster, the Murcielago has AWD, and is right behind the Enzo and the Mclaren F1. The Mclaren F1 meant to be the fastest street legal car. The Enzo meant to be a mix of a road car and a Formula 1 car.





The 1,000 Skyline in Top Gear has 1,000 horses produced at the crankshaft, and a lot less to the wheels. It is turbocharged, meaning lag, and more maintenance.





I don't like tuners. I like Muscle Cars, and European Supercars. No offense. Just my opinion.





I still like the Enzo over all of them.|||The Mclaren F1 would win. Best Aerodyamics. Best handling.|||If by McLaren you mean THE 1995 McLaren F1 LM than it is definatly the best one.





Engine Type: V12


HP: 680 @ 7800 rpm


Torque: 705 Nm


Acceleration 0-100 kph (0-62mph): 3 seconds


Top Speed: 362 Kph (225 mph)


Weight: 1062 Kg (2336 lb)





As you may see, it is the ultimate racing machine. On the road however you actually have to use headphones to talk to the passangers because of the engine's loud sound and the ride if very stiff because of the racing suspension.


However if it is an exclusive track car and not an "all-rounder" that you are talking about, the McLaren F1 is the best.


Let me also say that that engine sings a beautiful sound :)